Caberfae
Actually, I liked Schanke quite a bit and preferred him to Tracy. I think
having him know about the vampires would have made for some interesting insight.
Schanke strikes me as a bit of an "Everyman" type of guy. Watching him deal
with the reality of something that simply was not part of his worldview, of
anything he would have naturally accepted as reality, would have been
revealing. When you present someone with incontrovertible proof that something
that is not a part of their reality actually IS usually throws them into "well,
if THAT is real, then what else that I don't believe actually exists" kind of
mode. It could have been very enlightening. |
Lori A. Martello
Yes Schanke should have known. Imagine the possibilities with LaCroix
intimidating him. Nick trying to keep him out of harms way... but then if that
had happened we never would have had Tracey and Vachon. |
Shirley Davis
I didn't care for Schanke a whole lot anyway. Although I think he was the best
out of all the partners Nick had. But no, I would of like him even less if he
had known about vampires. Sometimes you just got to keep your friends (partners)
guessing. |
Danielle Laux
Yes, because if he knew that vampires were real then he would have known Nick
was a vampire (He could put 2 and 2 together). It would of had cooler
conflicted. Bye. :):):) |
Beverly Turner
I don't think Schanke could handle knowing about vampires and if he did he
would have been smart enough to find out his partner was one. |
Amy P Reed
Geez, I'm not sure. I could just about go either way on this one. I'm writing a
story about how Schanke found out about Nick, but I have to admit he had some
REALLY good lines. e.g. "A tanned vampire. What a JERK!" I don't suppose you have an "undecided" box I could fill in. Sorry, I guess it would have to depend on how he acted. |
Deborah Sandine
Interesting question.
Schanke's knowing about vampires wouldn't have made me like him more or
less, but I do wish he had found out before he died. I wanted to see how
he would have handled the knowledge -- I think it would probably have made him
very uncomfortable, and he would have made a lot of bad jokes about it, and he
would not have been able to keep his mouth shut. If he were left with the
knowledge long enough he probably would have blown Nick's cover, and Nick would
have had to leave. All the same, I sympathized with Schanke's growing
frustration about how Nick always was the hero -- got everywhere first,
magically caught the suspect, etc. Maybe he would have had an easier time with
that if he had known that Nick was not in fact human. |
Naomi Engle
I like Schanke not knowing Nick was a vampire. He's too down to earth to
believe in them and I don't think he would have been able to have the caring
relationship with Nick that he did. He mentioned a time or two that Nick was
his best friend. I don't think he could cope with having a vampire for a best
friend. |
Nyx Fixx
Schanke's monumental oblviousness to Nick's peculiarities was one of the most
amusing, endearing things about him, I thought. Much better to let him remain
in the dark. Ignorance is bliss. |
Becky Chessman
I'd like Schanke just the same whether he knew about vampires or not. He DID
find out in "Close Call," but LaCroix convinced him to ignore his own
suspicions. I'd love to see more of Schanke in future movies. I'd love to have
him re-discover Nick's secret. In "Close Call" he was tempted to expose Nick,
but I think he might not if he had time to think it over. It just kills Schank
not to be in on the secrets of his friends. And he loves showing how well he
can be faithful and useful to his friends. It would be loads of fun to watch
him get caught in a position where he had to keep Nick's secret and jeopardize
remaining the good cop he's always been proud of being because of a conflict of
interest. It'd also be fun to see him and LaCroix develop a standoffish kind of
relationship around and behind Nick. I loved the Schanke character. The show
really suffered when they lost both the Schankster and Janette. A lot of
balance was missing this last year. |
Karen C. Smith
I definitely would have liked Schanke LESS if he knew about vampires. A large
part of this character's appeal was his blissful ignorance. Having Schanke
miss so many obvious clues (clews?) was what made him Schanke. How could a
police detective be so oblivious to what was happening right under his nose in
regards to Nick and LC? How could he ever solve a crime when he can't see
what's going on in the precinct office? But, that's what his character was
about, just like Tracy Vetter was supposed to be ditzy, perky, dumb and
annoying. Maybe she was the reincarnation of Schanke? In drag, no less! Yikes!!
Besides Schanke seemed to resist the information that he was getting about
vampires, maybe he just didn't WANT to believe. |
Sheila A. Coneybeer
Schanke matters neither way for me. Him not knowing and always wondering how
Nick did some of the things he did just made him seem kinda dense. Like how
could he have made detective..... Get my drift. To me, the best thing Schanke
did was to lighten things when Nick was too "Oh woe is me, everything is my
fault" whether it was or not. I at least appreciated him for what I felt his
real purpose was, which was to provide some comic relief for a topic (vampires)
which centered on the death of humans as part of the food chain. |
Nicole Nelson-Hicks
The only positive thing I can think of that would support Schanke learning
about Nick is finally having someone on the show who didn't have such a
disapproving eye on all things vampiric. I think Schanke probably would've been
a hell of alot more forgiving than Natalie ever was.
That's the one thing I hate about mortals. You all can't stand the idea that
maybe God's special little chittlin's are on somebody else's menu! |
Carolyn Alutius
Naaah. I know it seemed kind of stupid that he couldn't figure it out, but
let's face it, that's not necessarily a conclusion a sane person would jump to.
They explored this theory very well in "close call", I think it was. Secondly,
I don't think he would handle it well, I think he'd start expecting too much
from Nick. You know, "Hey, you're the vampire, you go corner the bad guy."
Finally, I think Tracey should have known, really, since she knows about
vampires, but I think Schanke was good comic relief with his not knowing. He
was a good foil for Nick. |
Sharon Bauman
I never cared for the Schanke character to begin with. I thought he could have
been a good character, but the writers had him always whining about Nick
getting to the scene first or getting the collar first. Had he known Nick was a
vampire, he wouldn't have been any better - just whined more because Nick was
using powers Schanke didn't have. I was hoping he'd retire to Arizona, not get
blown up! |
Sherry van Swaringen
I think that if Schanke had known about vampires... or even known that Nick was
a vampire, his part in the show would have been less exciting. The whole thing
was him *not* knowing. It provided a little mystery... and at times the viewers
were kind of left with him... wondering. I think Schanke's not knowing made for
a rather intriguing character, on his part. |
Lucius LaCroix
I think that it would have been better, but only if he faked that he did not
know about it. |
Geraldine
Less. Because his jokes would not have been as funny in it's irony or him in
his ignorance. The show would have gotten a little too serious (like it did
with Tracey) and lose it's humour. |
Andresia
Hmmm, that's tricky. If Schanke knew about vampires I think it would have been
fun to watch him crack jokes about vampirism because he probably would be a bit
uncomfortable with the drinking-blood bit. But, then again, him not knowing
about vampires, is also fun because Nick drops little hints of it and he's
absolutely clueless. It also leaves the audience to wonder if he'll ever find
out about Nick and his kind. |
Karen
Interesting question, guys. I think it was best to leave Schanke in the dark
about vampires. A lot of the shows with him dealt with that he didn't know and
couldn't see or hear what Nick was showing him. The rapport between the two
would have changed and I don't think the friendship would have developed like
it did. Nick also needed another mortal friend, especially one who didn't know
his secret to make the show drive. One of the premises(sp) of this show, if I
remember when the movie promos were out, was how a vampire was going to be able
to deal with the 20th century and fit in with mortals. I think we all liked
Schanke because he didn't know and I guess, we wondered would he ever find out.
A show in which he did find out and then forgot or dreamt it might have
possibilities but I think it wouldn't have worked if it was permanent
knowledge. |
Eldon W. Brooks
I have only ever seen a few shows with Schanke as Nick's partner, but I would
have to say 'No' to the question. I think that Vampires are very secretive and
for a very good reason. I don't think that Schanke, the little I saw of him,
would have been able to either accept it or keep it a secret.
Now Tracey on the other hand should have known, she knew about Vachon. Why
not Nick? |
Verena D.
I would have like him to know about Nick and vampires. But he should've found
out by mistake. Then the storyline would for that would be really cool. Seeing
Nick pissed off is fun!!!! See-ya!! |
Laura Wiborg
Well my sister and I think yes because then Nick and him would have been better
partners. Well that is what we think By BY. |
Francisco Rodriguez Garcia
Always at the begining of a chapter, i�m waiting for that but sincerely i
prefer the game that always happens, Schanke is close to the truth but he never
reaches it.
Here in Spain the serie is in the first season chapters, i know the ending
of Schanke by the chapter index in another link so i�ll wait a little to see
how Nick lives in the next chapters because i don�t know how is his next
partner in the show. |
Spring E. Brooks
Yes, I would like Schanke still. I liked his character so much. |